Connecticut Employment Law Blog Insight on Labor & Employment Developments for Connecticut Businesses

Estimating the Costs of Litigation; Parallel Stories Illustrate Difficulty of Predicting Costs and Outcome of Litigation

Posted in Litigation

Returning from the ABA Meeting today, there were two stories over the last couple of days that have received some press. Taken together, they show the difficulties that companies and individuals have in predicting both the outcome of lawsuits and the coscourtesy morgue file "justice"ts of them.

First, the stories:

The gamble of going to trial doesn’t pay off for most plaintiffs, according to a study of more than 2,000 civil suits from 2002 to 2005.

Sixty-one percent of plaintiffs who turned down settlement offers ended up faring worse at trial, according to a New York Times story on the study. The average settlement offer was $48,700 and the average award at trial was $43,000, a difference of $5,700.

Defendants were wrong in just 24 percent of the cases, but for them the cost of a bad gamble was must larger. The average plaintiff’s settlement demand in those cases was $770,900 and the average verdict was $1.9 million, a difference of more than $1.1 million.

The conclusion to draw from both these stories is that litigation is tough.  It’s tough on plaintiffs and tough on defendants as well. Each side may have difficulty understanding the value of a case and have difficulty predicting what will happen. 

I’m sometimes asked at the very beginning of a case to present a "budget" and a estimated settlement value.  While it’s not an impossible task, the fact is there are so many variables to a typical employment case. Will discovery be intensive? Will witnesses be cooperative? Will there be lots of motions filed? And is the Plaintiff a "rational" player? In other words, will the plaintiff actually take a reasonable settlement offer? Each of these factors play an important rule in predicting the outcome and determining the best settlement "value".

Quite simply: Employment litigation is unpredictable.  And for both employees and companies, settling a case on their own terms may be the best way to avoid uncertain costs and guarantee the best outcome.

  • http://www.rtlitigation.com/2008/08/articles/employment-law/discrimination-suit-based-on-pregnancy-goes-to-trial/index.html Rogers & Tartaro Business Litigation Blog

    Discrimination Suit Based on Pregnancy Goes To Trial

    Late last week, Law.com reported that a trial had begun in the case of a former law firm associate and a former legal assistant who claim a law firm discriminated against them because they were pregnant. The story (“At trial,…

  • http://www.ctemploymentlawblog.com/2008/08/articles/decisions-and-rulings/the-latest-trend-another-freespeech-victory-for-employees/index.html Connecticut Employment Law Blog

    The Latest Trend? Another Free-Speech Victory for Employees

    Is a trend forming in First Amendment free-speech cases in Connecticut? It certainly seems that way. Last week, a jury returned a verdict in favor of Andrea Charron in her lawsuit against the Town of Griswold. The jury awarded damages…

  • http://www.ctemploymentlawblog.com/2008/09/articles/decisions-and-rulings/quick-updates-wwe-lawsuit-transgender-litigation-verdicts-on-the-rise-religious-discrimination-and-a-special-thanks/index.html Connecticut Employment Law Blog

    QUICK UPDATES: WWE Lawsuit, Transgender Litigation, Verdicts on the Rise, Religious Discrimination, and a Special Thanks

    The Jewish holidays starting tonight encourage reflection. So, it seems particularly appropriate to do some quick updates on earlier posts: The lawsuit against WWE by three wrestlers continues to move very slowly. Early press reports by another source …