ENDA - Federal Bill to Prohibit Sexual Orientation Discrimination May Have Limited Impact in Connecticut

The big headlines this week in employment law centeredThe U.S. Capitol - Public Domain around the passage in the U.S. House of Representatives of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA).  Various blogs have written about the law generally and they provide a good foundation for understanding the law in general. In particular:

  • The Volokh Conspiracy has summarized the law and added a scholarly approach to analyzing it. 
  • Workplace Horizons has continued their tracking of the bill and notes that Senator Ted Kennedy plans to introduce a similar piece of legislation in the Senate. 
  • Workplace Prof notes that a Presidential veto is likely, even though some compromises (such as excluding gender identity) have been made. 
Connecticut, however, already has a law that prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation. So is this a big deal?

The early answer is, probably not.  One significant caveat is that the legislation -- which has already been modified extensively -- is likely to go through another round of compromises at the Senate.  Thus, it is difficult to predict what will end up in the final piece of legislation.  Connecticut recently revised its laws on sexual orientation and civil union earlier this year, as noted in an earlier blog post

Assuming the legislation remains the same as printed now, there are several distinctions that would need to be determined under Connecticut law. First, ENDA appears to allow for claims of discrimination based on the perception of a person's sexual orientation. Connecticut has no corresponding provision and thus, ENDA would "trump" the state law and allow such a claim.  The definition of "sexual orientation" also differs under Conn. Gen. Stat. Sec. 46a-81a, with Connecticut defining it as having a "preference" for homosexuality, heterosexuality or bisexuality.

Second, ENDA only applies to employers who have 15 or more employees; Connecticut's law applies to much smaller employers.  Thus, Connecticut law will control here given the broad definition.

Third, ENDA contains an exemption from compliance for religious institutions, copying the protected afforded to those institutions under Title VII.   Connecticut does have an exemption for sexual orientation claims against religious organizations, but it is unclear if courts will interpret this statute differently than ENDA, if passed. 

All told, if passed, ENDA will certainly have some impact on Connecticut laws. However, at this stage, the impact would be minor -- particularly when compared to other states who do not have such laws. 

What I'm Reading About in Employment Law and HR Issues This Week

A few posts this week caught my eye:

  • First, the HR Carnival has a great post this week about various HR issues, including how to train managers better.  And, best yet, you'll find a link back to this blog.  Thanks to the writers of the Carnival for the reference.
  • Kris Dunn, over at HR Captialist,  has an interesting post about how HR professionals can help their companies keep benefit costs down. As Kris says, "If You Don't Have a Meaningful Answer to this Question From Your CEO, Update Your Resume..."
  • Evil HR Lady, has an informative post as to how employers can prepare for terminations and how to educate managers about the right ways to do so.
  • Workplace Horizons has been right on top of the Congress' consideration of ENDA, the Employment Non-Discrimination Act.  Near daily updates about the rumors of various amendments have been going up and its a useful site to keep track of certain pieces of legislation. 
  • And finally, The Employment Blawg has been posting a series of hypotheticals on different workplace situations including violence, workplace and overtime.  As stated on the blog "Read Trucks and Guns: An Employment Law Fable, Part I (Overtime for Truck Drivers) for the whole story. . . . It ends with an HR manager getting shot by the driver (just hypothetically)."