With UConn in both Final Fours, Are Employers Required to Give Employees Time Off If They Request It?

Right now, even non-sports fans here in the state can get pretty excited about having both the men's and the women's basketball teams from the University of Connecticut headed to their respective Final Fours.  

But suppose one of your employees was somcopyright 2009 Daniel A. Schwartz all rights reservedehow able to secure tickets to the games in either Detroit or St. Louis. Are you, as an employer, obligated to give that employee time off?

Well, the Department of Labor makes it very clear that items such as vacation pay are fringe benefits that are provided at the discretion of the employer.  

So, where does that leave many employers? It means employers will be bound by the rules they've set up in their policies or procedures manuals for handling days off.   Some employers give employees a good deal of flexibility about taking time off; others, who set schedules far in advance, are less so.  

Of course, there is always that one employee who calls in "sick" -- only to appear on television later on cheering at the game.  Can you discipline the employee then? The straight answer is typically yes. If employees are being deceptive about their absences, the employer has that discretion.

But here's hoping that everyone uses this time to play by the rules and shows a little bit of common sense.  In a time of economic hardship for so many, watching the games is a nice escape for a few hours.    

Go UConn!

Four Day Workweeks for State Workers? A Followup

Last week, I talked about a push by some state politicians to encourage more telecommuting and perhaps four-day work weeks among state workers.  The Connecticut House Republicans have even discussed it on their blog, House Rules.  The union representing state workers has also discussed the proposals in detail on its blog as well.

The Hartford Courant chimed in over the weekend with an editorial that encouraged state legislators to "conserve hot air by working together".  But ultimately, I suspect both sides will sit down and work on some proposal to address the underlying issues present. 

What continues to be fascinating about this debate is that path that some other states have chosen to go.  Delaware Employment Law Blog has interesting piece about Utah that is, understandably, somewhat critical of the proposal.  Utah is going to a mandatory four-day work week.  DELB also notes that Ohio didn't exactly have a great experience with four day workweeks before in a state experiment.  Will Utah's experience be different?

Aaron Newton sees things differently. In his post entitled "The Four-Day Workweek", he outlines the environmental case for a four-day workweek. (H/T Pennsylvania Labor & Employment Blog.) He then provides 16 reasons why this is an idea whose time has come.  It's a good primer on some of the issues related to a four-day work week. 

So what does the future hold? Using a trusty Magic 8-ball, the right answer to this issue is hazy.  For some employers, going to a four-day work week may make sense, but clearly for others, it won't. 

But one thing is clear: The issue is not going away and it would be beneficial for the state to at least look at the issue further.