Skip to content

Menu

Shipman & Goodwin LLP logo
HomeAboutTopicsSubscribeContact
Search
Close
Shipman & Goodwin LLP

Connecticut Employment Law Blog

Insight on Labor & Employment Developments for Connecticut Businesses

Home » Does Your CEO Own Her LinkedIn Account? One Court Says Yes, But…

Does Your CEO Own Her LinkedIn Account? One Court Says Yes, But…

LinkedIn_logo_1
By Daniel Schwartz on March 21, 2013
Posted in Highlight, Human Resources (HR) Compliance, Litigation, Manager & HR Pro’s Resource Center, Social Media

In legal circles, we’ve all been anxiously awaiting a result in the case of Eagle v. Morgan (download here) — a case out of Pennsylvania where the issue who owned a LinkedIn page and contacts (the employee vs. the employer) was front and center.

I talked about it in a post late last year, but if you still need to get up to speed on the case, the Employer Law Report blog has an excellent recap here.  I won ‘t repeat what is said there, but I do want to focus on a few things.  

The case is not terribly complex both legally and factually.

In the main claim, the former company founder alleged that the company wrongly took over her LinkedIn account (and using her password) in an attempt to divert business back to the company.  She alleged a variety of legal theories associated with such an action. 

The company, in turn, had filed a counterclaim that the employee misappropriated the LinkedIn account.  It argued that it had invested time and effort into employees’ LinkedIn account. 

As to the counterclaim, the court rejected it because the company never had a policy that required, for example, required its employees to use LinkedIn. A big flaw in the argument was that the LinkedIn User agreement says that the accounts are between LinkedIn and the individual. Therefore, the Company had no business idea that was misappropriated.   

The employee was able to show that the company “used” her name and derived commercial benefit from her likeness.  The employee also prevailed on her invasion of privacy claim and misappropriation of publicity claim as well. 

But such a victory is a hollow one for the employee. 

The court ultimately concluded that the employee could not establish monetary damages to a reasonable degree of certainty. Without this crucial element, the court does not award any damages. 

What’s the takeaway?

The case rests mainly under Pennsylvania state law, so its application to Connecticut isn’t directly transferable.  But some of the principles are likely to be applied in a similar fashion. 

So, employers would be wise to use this case as a warning that courts are not ready to throw out an employee’s claims that his or her publicity or privacy rights were violated. Indeed, if an employee can show actual monetary harm, a court may award damages too.

More importantly, the case emphasizes, yet again, the need for clear social media policies and practices.  If you believe your company owns a social media account, state it clearly and make sure the paperwork supports that view.

As social media continues to grow, these types of disputes may become more common.  Getting clarity at the outset will ultimately save a company time and heartburn later on.

Tags: eagle, eagle v morgan, edcomm, linkedin, misappropriation, morgan, ownership, pennsylvania, privacy, publicity, social media, social media account, user agreement
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Daniel Schwartz Daniel Schwartz

Dan represents employers in various employment law matters such as employment discrimination, restrictive covenants, human resources, retaliation and whistle blowing, and wage and hour issues. He has extensive trial and litigation experience in both federal and state courts in a variety of areas…

Dan represents employers in various employment law matters such as employment discrimination, restrictive covenants, human resources, retaliation and whistle blowing, and wage and hour issues. He has extensive trial and litigation experience in both federal and state courts in a variety of areas, including commercial litigation and trade secret enforcement. Dan is the author of the independent Connecticut Employment Law Blog. The blog discusses new and noteworthy events in labor and employment law on a daily basis.

Read more about Daniel SchwartzDaniel's Linkedin ProfileDaniel's Twitter Profile
Show more Show less
Related Posts
AIwork0
And yes, this is an AI generated picture
AI, Privacy and the Workplace - Free Upcoming Webinar
September 27, 2024
FIFAWorldCup
Are You Ready For Some "Football"? World Cup Fever Returns
November 18, 2022
sayan
Can You Say Anything? Free Speech in Independent and Private Schools
September 25, 2022

About Connecticut Employment Law Blog

Biography Photo of Daniel SchwartzDaniel A. Schwartz created the Connecticut Employment Law Blog in 2007 with the goal of sharing new and noteworthy items relating to employment law with employers, human resources personnel, and executives in Connecticut. Since then, the blog has been recognized by the ABA Journal, and was one of ten named to the “Blog Hall of Fame” in recognition of the blog’s contributions and consistency over the years.
Read More

About Employment Law Letter

Employment Law Letter features our lawyers posting timely updates, articles and information about current issues to keep our clients and friends informed of the latest developments relating to employment law.

View All Events

Stay Connected

Subscribe to this blog via RSS Follow Me on Twitter View My Linkedin Profile Join the Discussion on Facebook

Topics

Recent Updates

  • Why the Supreme Court’s Decision on “Reverse” Discrimination Has Little Impact on CT Employers
  • General Assembly Wrap Up: Expansion of Leave Laws
  • General Assembly Enters Last Week and the Employment Law Bills Are ….
  • What’s Better? Vacation or PTO? Both? Neither?
Shipman & Goodwin LLP logo

Connecticut Employment Law Blog

Connecticut|New York
Attorney Advertising
Subscribe to this blog via RSS Follow Me on Twitter View My Linkedin Profile Join the Discussion on Facebook
Privacy PolicyDisclaimer

About Our Firm

With more than 135 lawyers in offices throughout Connecticut and New York, we serve the needs of local, regional, national and international clients. Our clients include public and private companies, institutions, government entities, non-profit organizations and individuals.

Copyright © 2025, Shipman & Goodwin LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo