Skip to content

Menu

Shipman & Goodwin LLP logo
HomeAboutTopicsSubscribeContact
Search
Close
Shipman & Goodwin LLP

Connecticut Employment Law Blog

Insight on Labor & Employment Developments for Connecticut Businesses

Home » Using Social Networking Sites to Defend Your Company in Emploment Law Cases

Using Social Networking Sites to Defend Your Company in Emploment Law Cases

By Daniel Schwartz on April 11, 2011
Posted in Discrimination & Harassment

Back in October, Facebook came out with a little-discussed feature that allowed users to download their entire content with the click of a button.  Back then, before the legal impact was even considered, I noted that this could have a major impact on discovery issues.

Flash forward six months.  This prediction is becoming a reality.

Indeed, the speakers at a seminar I attended today on using social networking sites in litigation (while at ABA Techshow) highlighted this very feature as a game-changer on the issue of discovery.

No longer are companies required to spent countless hours subpoenaing Facebook for the records of the terminated employee who is suing you. Just ask for the Plaintiff to download all of his or her information and then move to compel if he or she doesn’t.

But beyond that, what today’s seminar emphasized is something that I’ve touched on before — people are leaving behind LOTS of clues as to who they are which leaves them susceptible to discovery.  

And employers (and others involving with litigation) need to find those clues which could become key pieces of evidence.

Courts are allowing this more and more, particularly in employment law cases.  An example discussed today was EEOC v. Simply Storage Mgmt, LLC (download here), decided in New York late last year.  In that case the court said that while the “discovery of SNS (social networking sites) requires the application of basic discovery principles in a novel context,” the issue for the court was  was to “define appropriately broad limits – but limits nevertheless – on the discoverability of social communications…and to do so in a way that provides meaningful direction to the parties.”

The court went out to state that discovery should be allowed of various social networking sites using this definition:

[A]ny profiles, postings, or messages (including status updates, wall comments, causes joined, groups joined, activity streams, blog entries) and SNS applications for claimants…that reveal, refer, or relate to any emotion, feeling or mental state, as well as communications that reveal, refer, or relate to events that could reasonably be expected to produce significant emotion, feeling or mental state.

For companies that are in the midst of such a litigation, don’t be afraid to use these tools at your disposal. There are limits to this, of course, but ignoring this information may be ignoring a piece of evidence to help defend your company.

Tags: facebook social "social networking" litigation discovery
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Daniel Schwartz Daniel Schwartz

Dan represents employers in various employment law matters such as employment discrimination, restrictive covenants, human resources, retaliation and whistle blowing, and wage and hour issues. He has extensive trial and litigation experience in both federal and state courts in a variety of areas…

Dan represents employers in various employment law matters such as employment discrimination, restrictive covenants, human resources, retaliation and whistle blowing, and wage and hour issues. He has extensive trial and litigation experience in both federal and state courts in a variety of areas, including commercial litigation and trade secret enforcement. Dan is the author of the independent Connecticut Employment Law Blog. The blog discusses new and noteworthy events in labor and employment law on a daily basis.

Read more about Daniel SchwartzDaniel's Linkedin ProfileDaniel's Twitter Profile
Show more Show less
Related Posts
supremecourt
Five Steps To Take When An Employment Law Lawsuit Has Been Filed Against Your Company
June 6, 2022
courtroom
Is the State of Employment Litigation Good for Employers or Bad?
May 23, 2022
congress
Surprise! Congress Passes Ban on Arbitration Clauses for Sex Harassment Claims
February 11, 2022

About Connecticut Employment Law Blog

Daniel A. Schwartz created the Connecticut Employment Law Blog in 2007 with the goal of sharing new and noteworthy items relating to employment law with employers, human resources personnel, and executives in Connecticut. Since then, the blog has been recognized by the ABA Journal, and was one of ten named to the “Blog Hall of Fame” in recognition of the blog’s contributions and consistency over the years.
Read More

About Employment Law Letter

Employment Law Letter features our lawyers posting timely updates, articles and information about current issues to keep our clients and friends informed of the latest developments relating to employment law.

View All Events

Stay Connected

Subscribe to this blog via RSS Follow Me on Twitter View My Linkedin Profile Join the Discussion on Facebook

Topics

Recent Updates

  • For Employers, Tick Tock on TikTok — Podcast Explores Labor’s New Frontier
  • EEOC Updates Guidance on COVID Testing and Other Related Topics
  • New CTFMLA Regulations Get Revised and a New Review
  • Employment Law Checklist: The Golf Exception to Child Labor Laws
Shipman & Goodwin LLP logo

Connecticut Employment Law Blog

Connecticut|New York
Attorney Advertising
Subscribe to this blog via RSS Follow Me on Twitter View My Linkedin Profile Join the Discussion on Facebook
Privacy PolicyDisclaimer

About Our Firm

With more than 140 attorneys in offices throughout Connecticut and New York, we serve the needs of local, regional, national and international clients. Our clients include public and private companies, institutions, government entities, non-profit organizations and individuals.

Copyright © 2022, Shipman & Goodwin LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo